Blogring.net - The Premier Myspace & Xanga Community


Go Back   Blogring.net - The Premier Myspace & Xanga Community > Blogring Official Forums > The Archives

The Archives All unneeded threads and useless topics, including spam and topics that go against the constitution are moved to this forum. If you're looking for a certain topic and can't find it anywhere, most likely it's in here.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

tigmarque tigmarque is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,813
Blogpoints: 1,044
tigmarque
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2004, 12:23 PM
Quote:
2. Doesn't support as many Javascripts as IE (some of which are needed for some sites)
Mozilla supports just as many "javascripts" as IE, but it supports them in the way that referral to the DOM is supposed to work. So if you come across a site where the Javascript doesn't work, blame the programmer, not the browser.

Quote:
Porn came with the d*mn thing, not only porn but the stupid viruses came with it as it does with porn ... from then on I knew it was bad
And are you sure that you downloaded Mozilla and not something else? Because if you downloaded it from http://www.mozilla.org then you shouldn't have had a single problem.

Quote:
sites load slower fonts are huge ad my site wont open in mozilla but opens fine in i.e. wow MOZILLA SUX ASS!
As above. Your code "SUX ASS", not the browser. If you tried coding to standards you would find that all of a sudden everything works in Mozilla and you need to start hacking it up to get it to work in IE.
KYLE LAMHEAD KYLE LAMHEAD is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,926
Blogpoints: 3,049
KYLE LAMHEAD
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:32 PM
well i have one question tigmarque so all of my codes work in every web browser except firefox and mozilla just becuz its not finished? umm.. that meens mozilla isnt smart enough to figure out whats wrong like i.e. and automatically fix it there self!
tigmarque tigmarque is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,813
Blogpoints: 1,044
tigmarque
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:39 PM
Chaos-bliss, don't be daft.
It's not that Mozilla isn't smart enough, it's that it actually tries to comply with the industry set standards which is something that Internet Explorer does not do (IE5 for Mac is only the exception to this).

Look at my websites - and I'm a web designer/developer by profession here. They all work in IE and Mozilla and I have absolutely no problem. in fact, I will rarely ever have a problem getting it to display in Mozilla. It is almost always IE that has the issues. It isn't that Mozilla isn't "smart" enough, its that the person programming is obviously too lazy or too dumb to do it right to begin with.

If you bothered to learn about standards and actually use them and learn about the DOM then maybe you would realise this.
KYLE LAMHEAD KYLE LAMHEAD is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,926
Blogpoints: 3,049
KYLE LAMHEAD
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by tigmarque@Dec 10, 06:39 AM
Chaos-bliss, don't be daft.
It's not that Mozilla isn't smart enough, it's that it actually tries to comply with the industry set standards which is something that Internet Explorer does not do (IE5 for Mac is only the exception to this).

Look at my websites - and I'm a web designer/developer by profession here. They all work in IE and Mozilla and I have absolutely no problem. in fact, I will rarely ever have a problem getting it to display in Mozilla. It is almost always IE that has the issues. It isn't that Mozilla isn't "smart" enough, its that the person programming is obviously too lazy or too dumb to do it right to begin with.

If you bothered to learn about standards and actually use them and learn about the DOM then maybe you would realise this.
ok well i dont look on i.e not having these comply with the industry standards i always thought of thatas a upside but maybe ill try to take your point of view in all of this.
tigmarque tigmarque is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,813
Blogpoints: 1,044
tigmarque
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2004, 02:01 PM
Honestly, I wasn't meaning to grate on people who didn't follow standards. It would be nice if everyone did but for personal websites, what the hey? It's a personal site.

I only really get antsy when a banks website for example doesn't work properly on all browsers (right down to the dreaded Netscape 4).

It would just be nice to know that the next generation of web programmers actually knew about these things.
xanga_addons xanga_addons is offline
Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 35
Blogpoints: -3,562
xanga_addons
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2004, 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by michaelczhang@Dec 9, 06:37 PM
I've always used IE (netscape long ago), and I don't really like the design and looks of mozilla or netscape, and IE is just fast and simple, so I stick with it.
Cuz your stupid site sucks. It lags the hell out of IE.

"Society is just begging to get criticized and what’s even sadder is that they’re too weak to even handle it."
- The_Criticizer

I encourage hating on Blogring.net. Membership is free, unlike Mike, who asks for 1.99.
ohnoxsirens ohnoxsirens is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,476
Blogpoints: 9,323
ohnoxsirens is an unknown quantity at this point
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2004, 12:36 AM
I use Internet Exporer, never used Mozilla. But I did use net scape too before I got OS X.
krayziekid727 krayziekid727 is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,419
Blogpoints: 44,368
krayziekid727
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2004, 04:47 AM
I use Mozilla. It's more stable. Sometimes IE works pretty great. Sometimes it just sucks. I find mozilla easier to navigate with and it's never frozen on me. But I still use IE a lot.
hips&hearts hips&hearts is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,247
Blogpoints: 1,613
hips&hearts
Send a message via AIM to hips&hearts Send a message via Yahoo to hips&hearts
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2004, 06:07 AM
Mozilla > IE
It DOES seem to be faster, which is nice, you have to admit. & I heard all of the adware is programed for IE, so it dosen't affect mozilla whatsoever, The whole multiple tabs on one screen option is something I can definitely get used to.

My lucky number is four billion. That doesn't come in real handy when you're gambling. "Come on, four billion! Seven. Fuuck. Not even close. I need more dice." - Mitch Hedberg


mi espacio (for real, this time.)
tigmarque tigmarque is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,813
Blogpoints: 1,044
tigmarque
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2004, 06:10 AM
Quote:
I don't really like the design and looks of mozilla
Another plus of Mozilla and its byproducts. You can skin it. So you don't ever have to complain about the way it looks again
Closed Thread



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 AM.



Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Passports Applications*Electricity Suppliers*Compare Mobile Phones*Free Adult Image Hosting*MPAA
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios