![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
Yet another reason film is better... Kodak just came out with this new film, 400 speed. If you adjust your settings right you can take good pics in dim light without flash. :blink: I never thought something like that would happen in my lifetime. So now you can take pics in places they orginaly didnt want you to, like castles and other torrist stuff, cause the flash wont deteriate the curtians, furnature, ect...
Im not sure, but I think all digi cams need flash, mabey even in bright light too. But if im wrong then what I just said is pointless. :unsure: ![]() Your signature has been removed because it exceeded 200px in height. Please read and follow the rules regarding signature size, found HERE. -Global moderator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
i love using film for my photobooks since the pictures are better quality. but digital cameras are easier to use. haha. both have their advantages.
![]() http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/3253/mr1ox.jpg i love arjun rampal ![]() jrock has taken over my life clickty click! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
Most of the cheap $100 digitals take really bad quality pictures. And most of the time when you use your zoom the pictures come out our pixelie!! I perfer Film because I have pride in the pictures I take. But I must say I like digital for the fact that you can preview the picture. For any quality picture i'd use film.
But they both have advantage!!! I mean I own one of each!!! It just depends what you use your pictures for. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
I like digital camera better than films. I think if you use a good digital camera you will have good-quality images.
![]() Your signature has been removed because it exceeded 200px in height. Please read the rules regarding signature size. -Global moderator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 PM. |