Discuss: Film or Digital?

[zombies999]

digital totally

[zombies999]

digital totally

[pawn on steroids]

film is fun, but they're a total b!tch to develop or if you don't develop your film, they're pretty expensive to develop. digital is easier because you get the see the picture right away and you could delete it on the spot. i like both.

[pawn on steroids]

film is fun, but they're a total b!tch to develop or if you don't develop your film, they're pretty expensive to develop. digital is easier because you get the see the picture right away and you could delete it on the spot. i like both.

[supa.fresh]

digital because you can delete and take as many pics as u want and see if u look good in them, before u print.

[BloodPromiser]

Originally Posted by droflaneb

Film for large prints (aka bigger than 8x10), digital for smaller ones and less important photos/experimentation.

You can get large prints with digital cameras too.

I would love to use a film camera, but I use a digital camera. I guess it's cheaper to use. If you don't want a picture, you can literally get rid of it with a press of a button. With film, you have to develop if before you decide if you want it or not.

I think I'm going to get a film camera later.

[shmuggy]

As far as price and convenience, digital is the way to go...but with film SLRs, it is kind of fun to develop it on your own and do all that good stuff to your pictures...photomontages and photograms...it does give a sense of pride when you can do stuff like that manually, without phtoshop. but getting cancer from the chemicals isn't too fun...ha. And how likely is it for you to have access to a darkroom?

[BloodPromiser]

^ *would love to build her own darkroom*
But for now, it's still digital. With my 400D. Lol